CAN harness:- Continuous Vs Daisychain, Shielded Vs Twisted pair
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 10:21 pm
I am planning to make my own custom CAN harness. I have a fairly full suite of MGL devices so I will have 6 devices on CAN 1 and 5 on CAN 2. I had been planning on a daisychain of individual 'links' using twisted pair, connected with small 2way Molex connectors and stubs to each device coming off the back of the plug at the end of each link.
However, I note that the wiring schematic for the MGL CAN harness on the Michigan Avionics knowledgebase specifies shielded cable rather than twisted pair. Furthermore, I have seen comment somewhere that it is best to avoid connections on CAN bus cables where possible.
As I am doing my own, I could use continuous shielded pair, expose the shield at each station, extract the two cores and splice in the stub wires to the device using solder sleeves, before sealing everything with heatshrink.
I would welcome opinions on the benefits, if any, of A. shielded Vs twisted pair and B. continuous cable Vs a chain of connected links. I have no reason to believe my plane will be especially noisy. All grounds are brought back in a 'star' configuration
However, I note that the wiring schematic for the MGL CAN harness on the Michigan Avionics knowledgebase specifies shielded cable rather than twisted pair. Furthermore, I have seen comment somewhere that it is best to avoid connections on CAN bus cables where possible.
As I am doing my own, I could use continuous shielded pair, expose the shield at each station, extract the two cores and splice in the stub wires to the device using solder sleeves, before sealing everything with heatshrink.
I would welcome opinions on the benefits, if any, of A. shielded Vs twisted pair and B. continuous cable Vs a chain of connected links. I have no reason to believe my plane will be especially noisy. All grounds are brought back in a 'star' configuration